QIN PLUS FWD vs Suzuki Ciaz 2021 1.5L GL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Price Comparison
TBD
BHD 5040
TBD
BHD 4800
TBD
BHD 68
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.4
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.6
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 2.8
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.2
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 12.4
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 18.6
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 146
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 219
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
165
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
1500
/
17
/
4
/
4765
4490
1837
1730
1495
1475
2720
2650
500
495
Fuel Economy
26
16.7
48
43
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
103 BHP
325
138
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
