QIN PLUS FWD vs Alsvin 1.5L Advanced Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Competitive price compared to competitors
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features for its class
Negative
- Limited internal space
- Material quality can be improved
- Engine performance is limited on highways
Price Comparison
TBD
BHD 5045
TBD
BHD 4825
TBD
BHD 68
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.4
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.8
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 2.8
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 5.6
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 12.4
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 24.8
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 146
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 292
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
1500
/
17
/
4
/
4765
4390 mm
1837
1725 mm
1495
1468 mm
2720
2535 mm
500
500 L
Fuel Economy
26
13 Km/L
48
45 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
105 BHP
325
145 Nm
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
