MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Limited 3.6L Standard Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.6
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.1
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.2
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7.7
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 18.6
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 34.1
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 219
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 401.5
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
SUV
/
10.9
/
Engine / Motor
170
181
4
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4314
4821
1809
1943
1624
1730
2585
2916
448
1028
Fuel Economy
17.2
8.8
48
93
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
112 BHP
290 BHP
150
350
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
