MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2012 Overland Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.6
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.4
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.2
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 9.8
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 18.6
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 43.4
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 219
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 511
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
SUV
/
10.9
/
Engine / Motor
170
181
4
8
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4314
4750
1809
2149
1624
1740
2585
2780
448
782
Fuel Economy
17.2
6.9
48
93
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
5.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
112 BHP
360 BHP
150
520
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
