ZS 1.5T LUX vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2016 Limited 5.7L Plus Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.6
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.4
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.2
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 9.8
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 18.6
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 43.4
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 219
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 511
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
12.8
/
Engine / Motor
170
181
/
8
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4821
1809
1943
1653
1730
2585
2916
359/1166
1028
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
7.4
45
93
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
5.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
350 BHP
/
520
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
