Volvo S40 2012 2.0L vs Suzuki Ciaz 2021 1.5L GL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Price Comparison
TBD
BHD 5040
TBD
BHD 4800
TBD
BHD 68
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.6
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.6
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.2
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.2
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 18.6
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 18.6
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 219
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 219
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Engine / Motor
215
165
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4476
4490
1770
1730
1454
1475
2460
2650
404
495
Fuel Economy
17.5
16.7
55
43
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
145 BHP
103 BHP
185
138
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
