CarteaCompare CarsVolkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 vs Suzuki Ciaz 2021 1.5L GL

Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 vs Suzuki Ciaz 2021 1.5L GL Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Very economical in fuel consumption
  • Spacious and comfortable interior
  • Low purchase and maintenance cost

Negative

  • Relatively poor engine performance
  • The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
  • Lack of advanced technological features

Price Comparison

TBD

BHD 5040

TBD

BHD 4800

TBD

BHD 68

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.11 L/KM

0.06 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

BHD 1.1

Daily Fule Payment

BHD 0.6

Weekly Fule Payment

BHD 7.7

Weekly Fule Payment

BHD 4.2

Monthly Fule Payment

BHD 34.1

Monthly Fule Payment

BHD 18.6

Yearly Fule Payment

BHD 401.5

Yearly Fule Payment

BHD 219

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Engine / Motor

250

165

6

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5059

4490

1903

1730

1450

1475

2881

2650

500

495

Fuel Economy

8.8

16.7

90

43

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.2 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

280 BHP

103 BHP

370

138

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Baleno 2018 1.4L GLX

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6

VS

Changan | Alsvin 1.5L Advanced

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Baleno 2022 1.5L GL

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Ciaz 2021 1.5L GL

Volkswagen Related Car

Suzuki Related Car