CarteaCompare CarsRX9 COM 4WD 2025 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2012 Overland

RX9 COM 4WD 2025 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2012 Overland Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Versatility of options for powerful engines
  • Impressive off-road driving capabilities
  • High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies

Negative

  • High fuel consumption for some models
  • High price compared to some competitors
  • Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces

Price Comparison

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.07 L/KM

0.14 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

BHD 0.7

Daily Fule Payment

BHD 1.4

Weekly Fule Payment

BHD 4.9

Weekly Fule Payment

BHD 9.8

Monthly Fule Payment

BHD 21.7

Monthly Fule Payment

BHD 43.4

Yearly Fule Payment

BHD 255.5

Yearly Fule Payment

BHD 511

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

181

/

8

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

21

/

/

4750

/

2149

/

1740

/

2780

/

782

Fuel Economy

14.8

6.9

/

93

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

3

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

12

/

Bose

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

9-Speed Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

5.7 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

235 BHP

360 BHP

/

520

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | RX9 COM 4WD 2025

VS

Lynk & Co | Renew 1.5T PRO

MG | RX9 COM 4WD 2025

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Limited 3.6L Standard

MG | RX9 COM 4WD 2025

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2012 Overland

MG | RX9 COM 4WD 2025

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Limited 5.7L Plus

MG | RX9 COM 4WD 2025

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2016 Limited 5.7L Plus

MG Related Car

Jeep Related Car

Jeep Related Used Car