Qin Plus Premium vs Honda Accord 2023 1.5T LX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Smooth and safe driving experience
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- Screen technologies and user interface need to be improved
- Traditional exterior design lacks innovation
- Off-road performance affects comfort
Price Comparison
BHD 8017
BHD 10400
BHD 7684
BHD 9999
BHD 108
BHD 140
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.4
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.5
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 2.8
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 3.5
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 12.4
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 15.5
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 146
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 182.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
195
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
1500
/
17
/
4
/
4765
4890
1837
1860
1495
1450
2720
2830
500
473
Fuel Economy
26
18.5
48
56
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
177 BHP
198 BHP
325
260
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
