Master L4H3 vs Toyota Hiace 2019 2.5L Commuter A/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
BHD 11516
BHD 14040
BHD 11079
BHD 13500
BHD 155
BHD 189
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.9
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 6.3
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 25.2
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 328.5
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
3
3 Seater
2420
/
16
/
6848
4715
2808
1985
4332
2985
4.5T
/
167
/
17m³
/
/
1800
/
6000
Fuel Economy
100
75
/
10.8
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.3
2.5 L
Diesel
Diesel
125
102 BHP
/
260
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
