Land Cruiser 4.0L GXR vs Tahoe Z71 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
BHD 28819
BHD 30974
BHD 27691
BHD 29768
BHD 388
BHD 417
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.1
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7.7
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 34.1
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 31
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 401.5
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 365
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
180 km/h
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
5145 mm
5181
1980 mm
2053
1890 mm
1925
2890 mm
3071
1004 L
3479
221 m
/
/
20
Fuel Economy
9.4 Km/L
9.7
110 L
100
9.4 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
Smart Key
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Gideon/Dark Atmosphere premium cloth
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
10.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
frontal airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; seat-mounted side-impact airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; driver inboard seat-mounted side-impact airbag; headcurtain airbags for all rows in outboard seating positions3,4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
8
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
BOSE
Transmission
Automatic
10AT
/
Electronic Limited Slip Differential (Active Reponse 4WD)
/
AT
/
10
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
4.0 L
5.3 L / 6.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
271 BHP
420 BHP
385 Nm
518/624
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
