ZS 1.5L STD vs RX5 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
BHD 5785
BHD 8608
BHD 5524
BHD 8240
BHD 78
BHD 116
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.6
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.7
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.2
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.9
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 18.6
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 21.7
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 219
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 255.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
190 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
/
17
18
5
/
4323
4571 mm
1809
1855 mm
1653
1719 mm
2585
2708 mm
359/1166
430 L
145
145
Fuel Economy
17.2
14.7 Km/L
45
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
2
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
14.1
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
225/50 R18
215/55 R17
225/50 R18
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
171 BHP
88
/
180
275 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
