ZS 1.5L STD vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
BHD 5785
BHD 25483
BHD 5524
BHD 24511
BHD 78
BHD 343
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.6
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.1
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.2
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7.7
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 18
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 33
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 219
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 401.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
5 Doors
4323
5115 mm
1809
1980 mm
1653
1920 mm
2585
2890 mm
359/1166
1004 L
145
221 m
Fuel Economy
17.2
9.4 Km/L
45
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Entry
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
Fabric
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
9
✓
/
✓
/
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
271 BHP
88
/
180
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
