ZS 1.5L STD vs 212 Adventure Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
BHD 5785
BHD 12777
BHD 5524
BHD 12281
BHD 78
BHD 172
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.6
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.1
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.2
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7.7
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 18
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 33
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 219
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 401.5
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
2150
17
/
5
/
4323
4705
1809
1895
1653
1936
2585
2860
359/1166
/
145
235
/
1598
/
1598
/
40
/
36
/
23.6
Fuel Economy
17.2
9.1
45
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
248 BHP
88
/
180
410
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
