CarteaCompare CarsY Plus 510 vs MG RX5 2023 1.5T STD

Y Plus 510 vs MG RX5 2023 1.5T STD Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful engine performance
  • Spacious internal storage capacity
  • High quality interior materials

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is higher than expected
  • Relatively old navigation technologies
  • Off-road driving comfort is limited

Price Comparison

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0 L/KM

0.07 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

/

Daily Fule Payment

BHD 0.7

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

BHD 4.9

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

BHD 21.7

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

BHD 255.5

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

/

9.4

Engine / Motor

/

190

/

4

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4535

4571

1870

1855

1650

1719

2750

2708

/

430

Fuel Economy

/

14.7

/

55

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

215/55 R17

/

215/55 R17

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

136 BHP

171 BHP

/

1.5 L

/

275

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | Y Plus 510

VS

Lynk & Co | Renew 1.5T PRO

GAC | Y Plus 510

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Limited 3.6L Standard

GAC | Y Plus 510

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2012 Overland

GAC | Y Plus 510

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Limited 5.7L Plus

GAC | Y Plus 510

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2016 Limited 5.7L Plus

GAC Related Car

MG Related Car