X5 M50i xDrive vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
BHD 45542
BHD 25483
BHD 43810
BHD 24511
BHD 613
BHD 343
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.1
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.1
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7.7
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7.7
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 34.1
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 34.1
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 401.5
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 401.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4922 mm
5115 mm
2004 mm
1980 mm
1745 mm
1920 mm
2975 mm
2890 mm
645 L
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
9.5 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
83 L
110 L
9.5 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.4 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
530 BHP
271 BHP
750 Nm
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
