Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L STD (7-Seater) vs T01 Adventurer Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical fuel efficiency
Negative
- Engine performance is poor at high speeds
- Low quality interior design
- Lack of modern technical features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
BHD 7494
BHD 12777
BHD 7170
BHD 12281
BHD 101
BHD 172
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.96
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.32
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 6.72
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 9.24
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 26.88
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 36.96
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 350.4
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 481.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175
/
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4435
4705
1695
1895
1705
1936
2685
2860
213
/
/
2150
/
17"
/
1598
/
1598
/
235
/
40
/
36
/
23.6
Fuel Economy
12.5
9.1
45
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.25-inch
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3-inch
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
8AT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
103 BHP
248 BHP
135
410
/
Turbocharge
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
• Standard • Economic • Sport • Snow • Sand • Rock • Mud • Wade • Mountain • Uneven
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)