CarteaCompare CarsS7 Pro vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

S7 Pro vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Price Comparison

TBD

BHD 25483

TBD

BHD 24511

TBD

BHD 343

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.06 L/KM

0.11 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

BHD 0.6

Daily Fule Payment

BHD 1.1

Weekly Fule Payment

BHD 4.2

Weekly Fule Payment

BHD 7.7

Monthly Fule Payment

BHD 18.6

Monthly Fule Payment

BHD 34.1

Yearly Fule Payment

BHD 219

Yearly Fule Payment

BHD 401.5

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

210 km/h

/

6

/

3490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4900

5115 mm

1950

1980 mm

1780

1920 mm

2880

2890 mm

/

5 Doors

/

1004 L

/

221 m

Fuel Economy

16

9.4 Km/L

/

110 L

/

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Four Wheel Drive

Engine

1.5

4.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

160 BHP

271 BHP

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

385 Nm

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | S7 Pro

VS

Lynk & Co | Renew 1.5T PRO

GAC | S7 Pro

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Limited 3.6L Standard

GAC | S7 Pro

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2012 Overland

GAC | S7 Pro

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Limited 5.7L Plus

GAC | S7 Pro

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2016 Limited 5.7L Plus

GAC Related Car

Toyota Related Car

Toyota Related New Car

Toyota Related Used Car