RAV4 2.5L (4WD) EXR vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
BHD 12099
BHD 25483
BHD 11594
BHD 24511
BHD 163
BHD 343
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.7
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.1
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.9
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7.7
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 21.7
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 34.1
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 255.5
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 401.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210 km/h
4
6
2490 cc
3490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4570 mm
5115 mm
1845 mm
1980 mm
1660 mm
1920 mm
2660 mm
2890 mm
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
14.2 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
55 L
110 L
14.2 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.5 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
Twin Turbo
4
4
203 BHP
271 BHP
243 Nm
385 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
