Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs T2 Standard Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and modern design
- Outstanding financial value
- Spacious interior space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Suspension tuning is strict
- Average noise insulation
Price Comparison
TBD
BHD 15596
TBD
BHD 14979
TBD
BHD 210
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.1
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.9
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7.7
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 6.3
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 34.1
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 27.9
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 401.5
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 328.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
180 km/h
6
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5100
4785 mm
1994
2006 mm
1756
1880 mm
3010
2800 mm
566
752 L
/
5 Doors
/
220 mm
Fuel Economy
9.1
11 Km/L
/
70 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
345 BHP
250 BHP
500
390 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
