Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs MG RX5 2023 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.6
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.7
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.2
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.9
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 18.6
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 21.7
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 219
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 255.5
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
190
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4275
4571
1765
1855
1535
1719
2570
2708
240
430
Fuel Economy
15.4
14.7
48
55
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
148 BHP
171 BHP
192
275
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
