Land Cruiser Hybrid VXR vs X5 M50i xDrive Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Price Comparison
BHD 41669
BHD 45542
BHD 40042
BHD 43810
BHD 561
BHD 613
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.9
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.1
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 6.3
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7.7
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 27
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 33
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 328.5
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 401.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
3498
/
GCC
/
/
250 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5005
4922 mm
1980
2004 mm
1940
1745 mm
/
2975 mm
/
645 L
Fuel Economy
10.9
9.5 Km/L
98
83 L
/
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front, Rear And Third Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
11
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
14
/
JBL
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
265/55 R20
/
265/55 R20
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
4.4 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
457 BHP
530 BHP
790
750 Nm
24 V, DUAL VVT-I, V35A-FTS
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
