Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR vs RX5 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
BHD 25483
BHD 8608
BHD 24511
BHD 8240
BHD 343
BHD 116
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.1
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.7
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7.7
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.9
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 34.1
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 21.7
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 401.5
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 255.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
190 km/h
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
5115 mm
4571 mm
1980 mm
1855 mm
1920 mm
1719 mm
2890 mm
2708 mm
1004 L
430 L
221 m
145
/
18
Fuel Economy
9.4 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
110 L
55 L
9.4 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
14.1
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
V
/
4.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
271 BHP
171 BHP
385 Nm
275 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
