CarteaCompare CarsHS 2.0T Comfort vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

HS 2.0T Comfort vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Price Comparison

BHD 8461

BHD 25483

BHD 8105

BHD 24511

BHD 114

BHD 343

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.08 L/KM

0.11 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

BHD 0.8

Daily Fule Payment

BHD 1.1

Weekly Fule Payment

BHD 5.6

Weekly Fule Payment

BHD 7.7

Monthly Fule Payment

BHD 24

Monthly Fule Payment

BHD 33

Yearly Fule Payment

BHD 292

Yearly Fule Payment

BHD 401.5

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

210 km/h

/

6

/

3490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4574 mm

5115 mm

1876 mm

1980 mm

1685 mm

1920 mm

2720 mm

2890 mm

463 L

1004 L

/

5 Doors

/

221 m

Fuel Economy

12.2 Km/L

9.4 Km/L

55 L

110 L

12.2 Km/L

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

4.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

231 BHP

271 BHP

360 Nm

385 Nm

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

MG Related Car

Toyota Related Car