H7 Adventure 4×4 vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
BHD 11065
BHD 25483
BHD 10621
BHD 24511
BHD 149
BHD 343
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.1
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7.7
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 34.1
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 401.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4705
5115 mm
1908
1980 mm
1780
1920 mm
/
5 Doors
/
2890 mm
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
/
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Driver Seat
/
Leather
Fabric
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
6
/
✓
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.6
9
✓
/
10
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
Rear
/
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/60 R19
/
235/60 R19
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
234
271 BHP
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
385 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
(AUTO, STANDARD, SPORT, ECO, SNOW, MUD, SAND , GRASS/GRAVEL, UNEVEN
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
