Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) vs X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Price Comparison
BHD 277132
BHD 10613
BHD 266657
BHD 10165
BHD 3730
BHD 143
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.15 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.5
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.8
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 10.5
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 5.6
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 45
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 24
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 547.5
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 292
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
220 km/h
/
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
5 Doors
5 Doors
5341 mm
4749 mm
2164 mm
1900 mm
1835 mm
1720 mm
3295 mm
2745 mm
600 L
480 L
/
210 mm
Fuel Economy
6.7 Km/L
13 Km/L
6.7 Km/L
13 Km/L
/
57 L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
6.7 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
563 BHP
197 BHP
850 Nm
290 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
