CR-V TOURING vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L GLS 5 Door Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
BHD 18500
BHD 13000
BHD 17800
BHD 12500
BHD 249
BHD 175
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.3
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 9.1
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 40.3
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 474.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
1498cc
/
/
180
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
1783
/
18 英寸
/
/
/
4706
4900
1866
1875
1681
1870
2700
2780
150
1081
198
/
Fuel Economy
57
88
/
7.7
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
√
/
√
✓
√
✓
√
✓
√
/
√
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
235/60R18
/
235/60R18
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
/
✓
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
1.5L VTEC Turbo
/
4
/
10.3:1
/
DOHC DUAL VTC + Exhaust-VTEC
/
190
189 BHP
140.7
/
6000
/
243
306
1700-5000
/
VTEC
/
直喷
/
Euro 5
/
Technologies
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
