C5 2025 Comfort vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
BHD 7495
BHD 25483
BHD 7171
BHD 24511
BHD 101
BHD 343
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.9
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1.1
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 6.3
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7.7
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 27.9
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 34.1
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 328.5
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 401.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
210 km/h
4
6
1496 cc
3490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
1381
/
5
5 Doors
4400
5115 mm
1830
1980 mm
1588
1920 mm
2630
2890 mm
360/1075
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
11.2
9.4 Km/L
51
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
4
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
10.25
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Macpherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
1.5 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
156 BHP
271 BHP
230
385 Nm
/
Twin Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
ECO, Sport
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
