ALL NEW CITY DX vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Price Comparison
BHD 7058
BHD 10471
BHD 6790
BHD 10054
BHD 95
BHD 141
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.7
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.9
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 21.7
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 255.5
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
195
195 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4589
4885 mm
1748
1840 mm
1467
1445 mm
2600
2824 mm
519
493 L
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
40
60 L
/
14.9 Km/L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
Infotainment
8
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
√
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
119
204 BHP
89
/
6600
/
145
243 Nm
4300
/
Technologies
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
