CarteaCompare Cars900 2.0T Ultra vs MG RX5 2023 1.5T STD

900 2.0T Ultra vs MG RX5 2023 1.5T STD Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful engine performance
  • Spacious internal storage capacity
  • High quality interior materials

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is higher than expected
  • Relatively old navigation technologies
  • Off-road driving comfort is limited

Price Comparison

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0 L/KM

0.07 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

/

Daily Fule Payment

BHD 0.7

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

BHD 4.9

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

BHD 21.7

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

BHD 255.5

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

4.6

9.4

Engine / Motor

240

190

4

4

Dimensions

6

5 Seater

5240

4571

1999

1855

1810

1719

3160

2708

/

430

Fuel Economy

/

14.7

/

55

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

275/45 R21

/

275/45 R21

/

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

540 BHP

171 BHP

1038

275

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Lynk & Co | Renew 1.5T PRO

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Limited 3.6L Standard

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2012 Overland

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Limited 5.7L Plus

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2016 Limited 5.7L Plus

Lynk & Co Related Car

MG Related Car