CarteaCompare Cars900 2.0T Ultra vs Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)

900 2.0T Ultra vs Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Price Comparison

TBD

BHD 13816

TBD

BHD 13277

TBD

BHD 186

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0 L/KM

0.08 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

/

Daily Fule Payment

BHD 0.8

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

BHD 5.6

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

BHD 24.8

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

BHD 292

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

4.6

8.3

Engine / Motor

240

210

4

4

Dimensions

6

7 Seater

5240

5075

1999

1969

1810

1716

3160

2930

/

407

Fuel Economy

/

11.9

/

74

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

275/45 R21

/

275/45 R21

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

540 BHP

226 BHP

1038

420

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Lynk & Co | Renew 1.5T PRO

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Limited 3.6L Standard

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2012 Overland

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Limited 5.7L Plus

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2016 Limited 5.7L Plus

Lynk & Co Related Car

Mazda Related Car