ZS 1.5L STD vs Changan CS95 2023 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
BHD 5785
BHD 12700
BHD 5524
BHD 12200
BHD 78
BHD 171
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 0.6
Daily Fule Payment
BHD 1
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 4.2
Weekly Fule Payment
BHD 7
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 18
Monthly Fule Payment
BHD 30
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 219
Yearly Fule Payment
BHD 365
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
185
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4949
1809
1930
1653
1790
2585
2810
359/1166
/
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
10.5
45
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
233 BHP
88
/
180
360
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
